Archief - Elektronisch roken Deel 2

ValeRossi46 zei:

Ik vraag mij altijd af..die e-smokers onder jullie..grijpen jullie ooit uit goesting is terug naar een sigaret..zeg maar na het drinken v x aantal pinten?

Klik om te vergroten...

ValeRossi46 zei:

Ik vraag mij altijd af..die e-smokers onder jullie..grijpen jullie ooit uit goesting is terug naar een sigaret..zeg maar na het drinken v x aantal pinten?

Klik om te vergroten...

ValeRossi46 zei:

Ik vraag mij altijd af..die e-smokers onder jullie..grijpen jullie ooit uit goesting is terug naar een sigaret..zeg maar na het drinken v x aantal pinten?

Klik om te vergroten...

Hatchetman zei:

Vertical coils
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_HOQN2eOjo

Klik om te vergroten...

ValeRossi46 zei:

Ik vraag mij altijd af..die e-smokers onder jullie..grijpen jullie ooit uit goesting is terug naar een sigaret..zeg maar na het drinken v x aantal pinten?

Klik om te vergroten...

Electronic cigarettes have received much attention and controversy – how do you think this debate will be resolved?

E-cigarettes are the most important development so far, not only in the treatment of tobacco dependence, but in tobacco control generally. If e-cigarettes are allowed to continue to compete with conventional cigarettes and develop further so that they give more and more smokers what they want from their cigarettes, smoking could virtually disappear.

As e-cigarettes are at least 95% safer than cigarettes, with nicotine by itself posing limited or no health risks outside pregnancy, it would seem that there is nothing not to like about such a scenario. Unfortunately though, policy-makers around the world have been influenced by misleading claims from a range of vested interests and people with misguided ideology.

It is likely that the population-wide switch from smoking to vaping will be prevented or at least considerably delayed by drastic and unwarranted regulation. Some countries such as Brazil, Egypt and Canada have banned nicotine-containing e-cigarettes, while allowing sales of cigarettes. USA and the European Union are poised to regulate e-cigarettes much more strictly than conventional cigarettes.

A new European ruling will for instance outlaw, without any rational justification, the type of e-cigarettes dependent smokers find most useful, and submit manufacturers to an extensive range of expensive regulatory demands that are far in excess of what is demanded from manufacturers of cigarettes. This raises alarming questions about the way public health arguments are presented to regulators.

The arguments for and against more liberal e-cigarettes regulation have been outlined in a number of commentaries, including the recent ‘pro’ and ‘against’ statements in BMC Medicine which the launch of a new article collection on promise vs perils of electronic cigarettes highlights.

What are your thoughts on anti-e-cigarette campaigns?
Peter Hajek

Peter Hajek


I understand, though do not approve of, the anti-e-cigarette campaigns driven by commercial motives. It is harder to comprehend campaigners motivated by misguided ideology. It is patently obvious that disseminating misleading scare stories about e-cigarettes puts smokers off making the switch to e-cigarettes which would undoubtedly benefit their health. Yet the anti-e-cigarettes proclamations are becoming more extreme.

Representatives of some well known public health and medical bodies in the UK and USA went on record with assertions that e-cigarettes are as harmful as or even more harmful than cigarettes. This kind of deception must be in breach of professional ethics, whatever the motivation behind it.

It would appear that what is behind this activism is an entrenched belief that nicotine use by itself, even if it is not associated with any ill effects, represents a sinful or corrupting indulgence and should not be allowed. Paradoxically, people who hold this belief see no problem at all with their own mild dependence on coffee and recreational use of alcohol.

I’m sure that such individuals do not consciously intend to protect the market dominance of cigarettes or to undermine healthier options smokers now have, but this is what they are doing and it does no credit to individuals and organisations that proclaim interest in improving public health.

What are the future directions in helping smokers quit?

If e-cigarettes are allowed to continue evolving and competing with conventional cigarettes, and if medical professionals and the media inform smokers truthfully about their harms relative to smoking, there is a good chance that within the next ten years smoking will be obsolete and some years later, smoking-related death and disease will virtually disappear.

It is possible though not certain that nicotine use would continue, predominantly in people who would otherwise smoke, but with little or no risks attached, it would gradually come to be seen in the same light that caffeine use is seen today.

Klik om te vergroten...

Hatchetman zei:

Merci, cloudhouse dan eens proberen voor base. % van pg/vg is idd niet zo belangrijk als het maar rond de 70/80 vg zit is goed, juist beetje schrik dat het te dik gaat worden als ik voor puur vg ga, met die 90/10 zal dat wel ok zijn. Flavors net op Flaywer gekocht, die hadden alles buiten basen.

Klik om te vergroten...