Archief - PC boot niet

Conclusion

Let's look at the thermal specification of both rivals first: The maximum thermal loss of the 2.0 GHz Sempron (2800+) is 68.3 W, while the Celeron D is specified at 73 W and thus less efficient in terms of power/performance.

After a short look at our benchmark results the conclusion is clear: AMD's Sempron is able to outperform Celeron D in most applications. In addition, motherboards based on the nForce2 IGP chipset offer more graphics performance than Intel's 865G platform at a similar and sometimes lower price - even though we're talking about a pathetic level of 3D experience here.

Klik om te vergroten...

But that is not the reason why value systems are bought. Price is what counts and this is why AMD is making extensive use of its proven technology. In order to grow its business, AMD needs to continually draw maximum value out of its existing products and to transfer that value to its customers. This is what AMD accomplished with the Sempron, by combining existing AthlonXP and Athlon64 features to fulfill a specific market sector demand, which in this case is the value processor market.

Klik om te vergroten...

Sempron Is The New Duron


With the Duron removed from the portfolio for some time, the AthlonXP has inevitably become the value model. Today, this is increasingly turning into a problem for Athlon64, as this brand is intended to represent a top-notch product. With so many suffixes like XP, FX, SE, XT and others around, the average user does not necessarily realize that AthlonXP does not have much in common with Athlon64.

Klik om te vergroten...