Time en andere zijn ook anti-Trump. Maar kom, ze halen allen hun info uit dezelfde studie.
Although the Center
does not do a “dynamic scoring” of Trump’s plan,
the Center recognizes the potential economic growth resulting from the lower tax rates in the plan. Nevertheless,
the Center explains that unless Trump’s enormous tax cuts are offset with very large spending cuts, “they’d increase the national debt and drive up interest rates, thus neutralizing their economic benefits.”
404 Error - Page Not Found | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget
Our estimates also do not represent a pure “apples-to-apples” comparison, whereas our previous estimates did. Our tax estimates for Trump are based largely (though not entirely) on those put forward by the Tax Foundation, while our estimates of Clinton’s tax plan come in large part from the Tax Policy Center.
Furthermore, our estimates are based on conventional scoring,
which does not account for the economic impact of various tax and spending changes. Some have suggested the economic effects could be large; for example, the Tax Foundation estimates Trump’s tax plan would increase GDP growth over the next decade by about 0.7 or 0.8 percent per year. However, these findings are far more generous than what official scorekeepers tend to estimate, and they do not account for the negative economic impact of higher debt, fewer immigrants, or less international trade. In our assessment, the macroeconomic impact of either candidate’s plan is likely to be small – and possibly negative – over a ten-year window.
Importantly, our analysis could change significantly based on new policies and further policy detail. We intend on continuing to update our analysis as more details are announced.
Dikke TBA dus.
.
